Style-Spotlight

What’s ‘Love’ Got to Do with Your ‘Bitch’ Condition? And do you need a heart if you don’t use it?

Gossip that has made the rounds on blogs this past week is making national news headlines, as the object of ridicule speaks back. The subject is Jennifer Love Hewitt and the angle is “fat”.

Can we be less original? Here’s “Love” last week on the beach:

When Hewitt wrote a blog response on her MySpace  (I cannot find member profile to confirm: source) claiming that “a size 2 is not fat!” this spurred the gossip hounds on.

“Jennifer Love Hewitt thinks she’s a size 2!”
“Jennifer Love Hewitt can’t count past 2″,

read harsher headlines (from the latest Technorati posts) alone.

These bloggers must have size 2 hearts. Come on people, it’s the holidays! What would Jesus do? I’ll tell ya. Be papparatzi-shot while walking on the water of that beach, only to have the only thing discussed is his widening waistline, since after all, he’s about to “turn a year older” soon.

And you would not want Jesus complaining about you on his MySpace. ‘Cause You Know Who would be his top friend.

A poll for children ages 2 (yeah I don’t know how it was conducted) to 17 found Britney Spears and Paris Hilton are “naughty.” Even more so than Darth Vadar (well, what has he done, lately) and the Grinch (hey, didn’t they both “turn to good” in the end?).

I say Christian because it’s obvious the terms are taken from Santa’s big ol’ list, and the time of year this is, but maybe those kids think repenting before death and/or Christmas Day makes one less evil than poptarts parading their vajayjay’s everywhere. It really is relative, huh?

I have issue with Miley Cyrus aka Hanna Montana topping the “nice” column for kids under 13. Children do forget easily, huh? Even about their stupid losing out on concert tickets. But what makes her “nicer” than anthropologist slash official Mrs. Adoption, Angelina Jolie (the elder kids’ fav)? Hmm?

Oh but the 13 to 17 year olds apparently do not forgive because Ms. Confessions of a Repentive Teen Star, Lindsay Lohan, came in 3rd naughtiest (rarr) on theirs.

Apparently drugs are just worse than murder and oh, stealing Christmas.

Source: TV Crunch

Was Sarah Jessica Parker’s recent onset upskirt ‘naughty?’ No, but/because she had ’spanx.’ Yes, she had big, white boxer-brief lookin’ undergarments on. They’re for sure Spanx, by looking at the sheerness in photo 1.

And now for some shoe spotting!!! More, more, more »

Rihanna was spotted a week ago in Melrose carrying a hard-to-find new quilted-leather Be & D bag that appears to flow with similar style to the current FW ‘07/08 Be & D line’s textured satchels, which in itself is mostly a tough-to-find buy atm.

Let’s rock those comparison photos……

I may not know where to buy, but now you know who to search for.

People’s Sexiest Man Alive this year (a ridiculous concept, that it changes every year) is Matt Damon. What? Look, he’s a great guy, but he ain’t that cute.

They’ve managed to take two out of three of the top men, as voted by them, and make them look old, tired and with lifeless hair. (McDreamy, however, is actually kind of McDreamy this season, actually.)
Ladies and Gentlemen, the true Sexiest Man Alive for a good while to come is actually… More, more, more »

But what really is here is Britney Spears, hot piece of anything anymore, or not.

See, her album’s not doing well anymore, so I thought you should take a listen to her new single, “Piece of Me“. It’s a good track about the paparazzi, etc. No really .. it’s good. Well, to a certain standard.

At least you’ll try it, the woman needs to feed her kids. Or she needs to pay Fed-X to feed them or something.

Here she is (on Wed.) wearing the new Balenciaga bag and - duh - a logo Chanel scarf.

But is Lindsay Lohan still fabulous or back to fabulous? Which ever, this might be back on a dangerous ride. Does the coke come next?

The photo’s via The Superficial, read there for a more negative perspective.

Baby dolls, tunics, they’re still everywhere stars are!

Photos via People

Meanwhile, the world has not catapulted into Hell just yet, perhaps…

There’s hope. In that young little Hayden Panettiere wears cream-toned panties. Yes, she wears panties.

Thank the Lord. After that headline, I was worried about my little Heroes star.

Good girl!

When I first read the photo headline - I had to look. (Come on!)

Then it hit me, “she’s pregnant, we can’t be looking at the panties of a pregnant woman! Have-” … then I saw the second picture. “That’s not panties.”

Oh my god! We can’t be looking at vaginas of pregnant women! Have some decency!

(Stop looking!! Now!!)

But then I started thinking — “Xtina! You’re PREGNANT! Have some decency!”

Is she worried about ruining underwear come water-breaking time? (When is that now, could be soon.) Insane labor speed goals??!

Gosh, if you must go pantiless for some reason, avoid motor vehicles entirely! Have you no brain??!

One final note, kudos on the wax job, I believe a woman must look her best come leg-spreading time. Yes, I especially mean labor.

Cick for more photos, #3 NSFW. More, more, more »