<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Style-Spotlight</title>
	<link>http://www.style-spotlight.net</link>
	<description>Dress Style, Life Style, The Stars are Under Scrutiny</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>&#8216;Love&#8217; Handling Gossip Attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.style-spotlight.net/love-handling-gossip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.style-spotlight.net/love-handling-gossip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Jean Snarker</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Gossip]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media News]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>ridicule</category>
	<category>speaks</category>
	<category>back</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>subject</category>
	<category>jennifer</category>
	<category>love</category>
	<category>hewitt</category>
	<category>and</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>angle</category>
	<category>making</category>
	<category>national</category>
	<category>news</category>
	<category>headlines</category>
	<category>blogs</category>
	<category>past</category>
	<category>week</category>
	<category>gossip</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>rounds</category>
	<category>week</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>beach</category>
	<category>original</category>
	<category>love</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>object</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.style-spotlight.net/love-handling-gossip/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#8217;s &#8216;Love&#8217; Got to Do with Your &#8216;Bitch&#8217; Condition? And do you need a heart if you don&#8217;t use it?
Gossip that has made the rounds on blogs this past week is making national news headlines, as the object of ridicule speaks back. The subject is Jennifer Love Hewitt and the angle is &#8220;fat&#8221;.
Can we be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>What&#8217;s &#8216;Love&#8217; Got to Do with Your &#8216;Bitch&#8217; Condition? And do you need a heart if you don&#8217;t use it?</em></p>
<p>Gossip that has made the rounds on blogs this past week is making <a href="http://movies.aol.com/news/story/_a/jennifer-love-hewitt-fights-back/20071203065609990001" title="AOL: Jennifer Love Fights Back">national news headlines</a>, as the object of ridicule speaks back. The subject is Jennifer Love Hewitt and the angle is &#8220;fat&#8221;.</p>
<p>Can we be less original? Here&#8217;s &#8220;Love&#8221; last week on the beach:</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.style-spotlight.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/jennifer-love-hewitt-2-bikini-11.jpg" alt="Jennifer Love Hewitt bikini" class="imageframe" height="630" width="420" /></p>
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
<p>When Hewitt wrote a blog response on her MySpace  (I cannot find member profile to confirm: <a href="http://www.bestcelebgossip.com/2007/12/03/jennifer-love-hewitt-reacts-to-online-photos-of-her/" title="Jennifer Love Hewitt thinks she's a size 2">source</a>) claiming that &#8220;a size 2 is not fat!&#8221; this spurred the gossip hounds on.</p>
<p align="center"><strong>&#8220;Jennifer Love Hewitt thinks she&#8217;s a size 2!&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Jennifer Love Hewitt can&#8217;t count past 2&#8243;,</strong>
</p>
<p align="left">read harsher headlines (from the latest Technorati posts) alone.</p>
<p align="left">These bloggers must have size 2 hearts. Come on people, it&#8217;s the holidays! What would Jesus do? I&#8217;ll tell ya. Be papparatzi-shot while walking on the water of that beach, only to have the only thing discussed is his widening waistline, since after all, he&#8217;s about to &#8220;turn a year older&#8221; soon.</p>
<p align="left">And you would <em>not</em> want Jesus complaining about you on <em>his</em> <strong>MySpace</strong>. &#8216;Cause You Know Who would be his top friend.</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.style-spotlight.net/love-handling-gossip/jennifer-love-hewitt-bikini-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-1638" title="Jennifer Love Hewitt bikini"><img src="http://www.style-spotlight.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/jennifer-love-hewitt-2-bikini-21.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Jennifer Love Hewitt bikini" class="imageframe" height="200" width="133" /> </a><a href="http://www.style-spotlight.net/love-handling-gossip/jennifer-love-hewitts-back/" rel="attachment wp-att-1639" title="Jennifer Love Hewitt’s back"><img src="http://www.style-spotlight.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/jennifer-love-hewitt-2-bikini-33.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Jennifer Love Hewitt’s back" class="imageframe" height="200" width="133" /></a></p>
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.style-spotlight.net/love-handling-gossip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Christian&#8217; Kids&#8217; Poll Finds Spears, Paris = &#8216;Naughty&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.style-spotlight.net/kids-naughty-07/</link>
		<comments>http://www.style-spotlight.net/kids-naughty-07/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Jean Snarker</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Angelina Jolie &#038; Brad Pitt]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Britney Spears]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Gossip]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Lohan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Paris Hilton]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>hanna montana</category>
	<category>naughty list</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.style-spotlight.net/kids-naughty-07/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A poll for children ages 2 (yeah I don&#8217;t know how it was conducted) to 17 found Britney Spears and Paris Hilton are &#8220;naughty.&#8221; Even more so than Darth Vadar (well, what has he done, lately) and the Grinch (hey, didn&#8217;t they both &#8220;turn to good&#8221; in the end?).
I say Christian because it&#8217;s obvious the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A poll for children ages 2 (yeah I don&#8217;t know how it was conducted) to 17 found <strong>Britney Spears and Paris Hilton are &#8220;naughty.&#8221;</strong> Even more so than Darth Vadar (well, what has he done, lately) and the Grinch (hey, didn&#8217;t they both &#8220;turn to good&#8221; in the end?).</p>
<p>I say Christian because it&#8217;s obvious the terms are taken from Santa&#8217;s big ol&#8217; list, and the time of year this is, but maybe those kids think repenting before death and/or Christmas Day makes one less evil than poptarts parading their vajayjay&#8217;s everywhere. It really is relative, huh?</p>
<p>I have issue with <strong>Miley Cyrus aka Hanna Montana</strong> topping the &#8220;nice&#8221; column for kids under 13. Children do forget easily, huh? Even about their stupid losing out on concert tickets. But what makes her &#8220;nicer&#8221; than anthropologist slash official Mrs. Adoption, Angelina Jolie (the elder kids&#8217; fav)? Hmm?</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.style-spotlight.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/hanna-montana_nice.jpg" alt="Miley Cyrus = not nice" class="imageframe" height="409" width="321" /></p>
<p>Oh but the 13 to 17 year olds apparently do not forgive because Ms. Confessions of a Repentive Teen Star,  Lindsay Lohan, came in 3rd naughtiest (rarr) on theirs.</p>
<p>Apparently drugs are just worse than murder and oh, stealing Christmas.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://tv.popcrunch.com/kids-poll-finds-britney-naughty-hannah-montana-nice/" title="Britney Naughty, Hanna Montana Nice">TV Crunch</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.style-spotlight.net/kids-naughty-07/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And SJP&#8217;s Upskirt was &#8216;Nice&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.style-spotlight.net/sjp-spanx/</link>
		<comments>http://www.style-spotlight.net/sjp-spanx/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Jean Snarker</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Best Dressed]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Fashion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Jessica Parker]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Shoe Spotting]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>sjp</category>
	<category>spanx</category>
	<category>underwear</category>
	<category>upskirt</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.style-spotlight.net/sjp-spanx/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Was Sarah Jessica Parker&#8217;s recent onset upskirt &#8216;naughty?&#8217; No, but/because she had &#8217;spanx.&#8217; Yes, she had big, white boxer-brief lookin&#8217; undergarments on. They&#8217;re for sure Spanx, by looking at the sheerness in photo 1.
And now for some shoe spotting!!!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="http://www.style-spotlight.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/sjp_upskirt_spanx.jpg" alt="Sarah Jessica Parker in spanx underwear" class="imageframe" height="520" width="497" /></p>
<p>Was Sarah Jessica Parker&#8217;s recent onset upskirt &#8216;naughty?&#8217; No, but/because she had &#8217;spanx.&#8217; Yes, she had big, white boxer-brief lookin&#8217; undergarments on. They&#8217;re for sure Spanx, by looking at the sheerness in photo 1.</p>
<p>And now for some shoe spotting!!! <a href="http://www.style-spotlight.net/sjp-spanx/#more-1629" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.style-spotlight.net/sjp-spanx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rihanna About in Melrose with Be &#038; D Bag</title>
		<link>http://www.style-spotlight.net/rihanna-be-d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.style-spotlight.net/rihanna-be-d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 14:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Jean Snarker</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Fashion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Handbag Sightings]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>rihanna</category>
	<category>be</category>
	<category></category>
	<category>d</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.style-spotlight.net/rihanna-be-d/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rihanna was spotted a week ago in Melrose carrying a hard-to-find new quilted-leather Be &#38; D bag that appears to flow with similar style to the current FW &#8216;07/08 Be &#38; D line&#8217;s textured satchels, which in itself is mostly a tough-to-find buy atm.
Let&#8217;s rock those comparison photos&#8230;&#8230;

 
I may not know where to buy, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rihanna was spotted a week ago in Melrose carrying a hard-to-find new quilted-leather Be &amp; D bag that appears to flow with similar style to the current FW &#8216;07/08 Be &amp; D line&#8217;s textured satchels, which in itself is mostly a tough-to-find buy atm.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s rock those comparison photos&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.style-spotlight.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/rihanna_be-d_bag.jpg" alt="Rihanna with Be &amp; D bag" class="imageframe" height="477" width="631" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center"> <img src="http://www.style-spotlight.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/bend_fw_bags.jpg" alt="Be &amp; D F/W 07/08 bags" class="imageframe" height="477" width="631" /></p>
<p>I may not know where to buy, but now you know who to search for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.style-spotlight.net/rihanna-be-d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What, is there a Minimum Age Req. for Sexiest Man Alive?</title>
		<link>http://www.style-spotlight.net/sexiest-man-alive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.style-spotlight.net/sexiest-man-alive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Jean Snarker</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Best Dressed]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Gossip]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media News]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>justin</category>
	<category>timberlake</category>
	<category>sexiest</category>
	<category>man</category>
	<category>alive</category>
	<category>sexy</category>
	<category>people</category>
	<category>magazine</category>
	<category>2007</category>
	<category>2008</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.style-spotlight.net/sexiest-man-alive/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People&#8217;s Sexiest Man Alive this year (a ridiculous concept, that it changes every year) is Matt Damon. What? Look, he&#8217;s a great guy, but he ain&#8217;t that cute.

They&#8217;ve managed to take two out of three of the top men, as voted by them, and make them look old, tired and with lifeless hair. (McDreamy, however, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.people.com/people/package/0,,20154290,00.html" title="People's picks for sexiest men">People&#8217;s Sexiest Man Alive</a> this year (a ridiculous concept, that it changes every year) is Matt Damon. What? Look, he&#8217;s a great guy, but he ain&#8217;t that cute.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.style-spotlight.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/peoples-sexiest-men_08.jpg" alt="People’s Sexiest Men" class="imageframe" height="300" width="400" /></p>
<p>They&#8217;ve managed to take two out of three of the top men, as voted by them, and make them look old, tired and with lifeless hair. (McDreamy, however, is actually kind of McDreamy this season, actually.)<br />
Ladies and Gentlemen, the true Sexiest Man Alive for a good while to come is actually&#8230; <a href="http://www.style-spotlight.net/sexiest-man-alive/#more-1622" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.style-spotlight.net/sexiest-man-alive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;ll lure you here with a piece of hot ass&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.style-spotlight.net/spears-piece-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.style-spotlight.net/spears-piece-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 18:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Jean Snarker</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Britney Spears]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Gossip]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media News]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>britney</category>
	<category>spears</category>
	<category>piece</category>
	<category>of</category>
	<category>me</category>
	<category>new</category>
	<category>single</category>
	<category>blackout</category>
	<category>album</category>
	<category>charts</category>
	<category>sales</category>
	<category>dropoff</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.style-spotlight.net/spears-piece-me/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But what really is here is Britney Spears, hot piece of anything anymore, or not.
See, her album&#8217;s not doing well anymore, so I thought you should take a listen to her new single, &#8220;Piece of Me&#8220;.  It&#8217;s a good track about the paparazzi, etc. No really .. it&#8217;s good. Well, to a certain standard.
Loading...
At [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But what really is here is <em>Britney Spears</em>, hot piece of <em>anything</em> anymore, or not.</p>
<p>See, her album&#8217;s <a href="http://thesuperficial.com/2007/11/britney_spears_album_sales_fall_off.php" title="The Superficial">not doing well anymore</a>, so I thought you should take a listen to her new single, &#8220;<strong><em>Piece of Me</em></strong>&#8220;.  It&#8217;s a good track about the paparazzi, etc. No really .. it&#8217;s good. Well, to a certain standard.</p>
<span class="coolplayer_wrapper"><span id="coolplayer_container_1804521422"></span><span class="coolplayer_info" id="coolplayer_info_1804521422" style="width: 478px;display: block;" ondblclick="coolplayer_input(this, '480', '380', '0', '0', 'utf-8', '');" title="Double click to input your media URL, and press enter to play it.">Loading...</span><script type="text/javascript"><!--
coolplayer('http://kyarbro123.imeem.com/music/1RpUCAxb/britney_spears_britney_spears_piece_of_me/', '1804521422', '480', '380', '0', '0', 'utf-8', '');
//--></script></span>
<p>At least you&#8217;ll try it, the woman needs to feed her kids. Or she needs to pay Fed-X to feed them or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.style-spotlight.net/spears-piece-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lindsay Lohan is Fabulous&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.style-spotlight.net/lohan-fab/</link>
		<comments>http://www.style-spotlight.net/lohan-fab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Jean Snarker</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Best Dressed]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Fashion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Gossip]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Handbag Sightings]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Lohan]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>balenciaga</category>
	<category>bag</category>
	<category>chanel</category>
	<category>scarf</category>
	<category>fashion</category>
	<category>celebrities</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.style-spotlight.net/lohan-fab/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here she is (on Wed.) wearing the new Balenciaga bag and - duh - a logo Chanel scarf.

But is Lindsay Lohan still fabulous or back to fabulous? Which ever, this might be back on a dangerous ride. Does the coke come next?
The photo&#8217;s via The Superficial, read there for a more negative perspective.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here she is (on Wed.) wearing the new Balenciaga bag and - duh - a logo Chanel scarf.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.style-spotlight.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/lindsay-lohan_07-11-20s4.jpg" alt="Lindsay Lohan" class="imageframe" height="600" width="400" /></p>
<p>But is Lindsay Lohan <em>still</em> fabulous or back to fabulous? Which ever, this might be back on a dangerous ride. Does the coke come next?</p>
<p>The photo&#8217;s via <a href="http://thesuperficial.com/2007/11/lindsay_lohan_likes_to_make_fa.php" title="Lindsay likes to make faces">The Superficial</a>, read there for a more negative perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.style-spotlight.net/lohan-fab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Celebritrend: down-to-Thigh Tops - Going Strong</title>
		<link>http://www.style-spotlight.net/trend-tunics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.style-spotlight.net/trend-tunics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Jean Snarker</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Fashion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Trends]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>baby</category>
	<category>dolls</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.style-spotlight.net/trend-tunics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Baby dolls, tunics, they&#8217;re still everywhere stars are!

Photos via People
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baby dolls, tunics, they&#8217;re still everywhere stars are!</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.style-spotlight.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/celebritend_downto_thigh-tops.jpg" alt="Star Style Trend Low-Reaching Tops" class="imageframe" height="527" width="554" /></p>
<p align="left">Photos via <a href="http://people.com" title="Star Watch">People</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.style-spotlight.net/trend-tunics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8230; However, there is hope&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.style-spotlight.net/hayden-wears-panties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.style-spotlight.net/hayden-wears-panties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Jean Snarker</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Celebriciety Transmitted Disease]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Fashion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Gossip]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hayden Panettiere]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>young</category>
	<category>hayden</category>
	<category>panettiere</category>
	<category>wears</category>
	<category>cream toned</category>
	<category>panties</category>
	<category>wears</category>
	<category>panties     thank</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>lord</category>
	<category>catapulted</category>
	<category>hell</category>
	<category>perhaps       there</category>
	<category>hope</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>world</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.style-spotlight.net/hayden-wears-panties/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meanwhile, the world has not catapulted into Hell just yet, perhaps&#8230;
There&#8217;s hope. In that young little Hayden Panettiere wears cream-toned panties. Yes, she wears panties.

Thank the Lord. After that headline, I was worried about my little Heroes star.
Good girl!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.style-spotlight.net/xtina-preg-upskirt/" title="NSFW">Meanwhile</a>, the world has not catapulted into Hell <em>just yet, perhaps</em>&#8230;</p>
<p align="left">There&#8217;s hope. In that young little Hayden Panettiere wears cream-toned panties. Yes, she wears panties.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.style-spotlight.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/hayden-panettiere-white-panties.jpg" alt="Hayden Panettiere exiting car" class="imageframe" height="882" width="487" /></p>
<p>Thank the Lord. After <a href="http://e-channel.blogspot.com/2007/11/hayden-panettiere-finally-upskirt.html" title="Hayden Panettiere Upskirt">that headline</a>, I was worried about my little <em>Heroes</em> star.</p>
<p>Good girl!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.style-spotlight.net/hayden-wears-panties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Headline News: Christina Aguilera&#8217;s New Upskirt Photos</title>
		<link>http://www.style-spotlight.net/xtina-preg-upskirt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.style-spotlight.net/xtina-preg-upskirt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Jean Snarker</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Baby Boom]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebriciety Transmitted Disease]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Fashion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Gossip]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Christina Aguilera]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fashion Frights]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>soon</category>
	<category>insane</category>
	<category>labor</category>
	<category>speed</category>
	<category>goals       gosh</category>
	<category>labor     cick</category>
	<category>photos</category>
	<category>vaginas</category>
	<category>pregnant</category>
	<category>women</category>
	<category>pregnant</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>panties</category>
	<category>avoid</category>
	<category>motor</category>
	<category>vehicles</category>
	<category>entirely</category>
	<category>decency</category>
	<category>worried</category>
	<category>xtina</category>
	<category>pregnant</category>
	<category>kudos</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>wax</category>
	<category>job</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.style-spotlight.net/xtina-preg-upskirt/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 

When I first read the photo headline - I had to look. (Come on!)
 
Then it hit me, &#8220;she&#8217;s pregnant, we can&#8217;t be looking at the panties of a pregnant woman! Have-&#8221; &#8230; then I saw the second picture. &#8220;That&#8217;s not panties.&#8221;
Oh my god! We can&#8217;t be looking at vaginas of pregnant women! Have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <a href="http://www.style-spotlight.net/xtina-preg-upskirt/pregnant-christina-aguilera/" rel="attachment wp-att-1609" title="Pregnant Christina Aguilera"></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.style-spotlight.net/xtina-preg-upskirt/pregnant-christina-aguilera/" rel="attachment wp-att-1609" title="Pregnant Christina Aguilera"><img src="http://www.style-spotlight.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/pregnant-xtina.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Pregnant Christina Aguilera" class="imageframe" height="400" width="323" /></a></p>
<p>When I first read the photo headline - I had to look. (Come on!)</p>
<p align="center"> <a href="http://www.style-spotlight.net/xtina-preg-upskirt/christina-aguilera-up-skirt/" rel="attachment wp-att-1611" title="Christina Aguilera up skirt"><img src="http://www.style-spotlight.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/pregnant-xtina_up-skirt.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Christina Aguilera up skirt" class="imageframe" height="349" width="400" /></a></p>
<p>Then it hit me, &#8220;she&#8217;s pregnant, we can&#8217;t be looking at the panties of a pregnant woman! Have-&#8221; &#8230; then I saw the <a href="http://www.style-spotlight.net/?attachment_id=1613" title="No panties!">second picture</a>. <strong>&#8220;That&#8217;s not panties.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p><strong>Oh my god!</strong> <em>We can&#8217;t be looking at <strong>vaginas</strong> of pregnant women! </em><strong>Have some decency!</strong></p>
<p><strong>(Stop looking!! <em>Now!!</em>)</strong></p>
<p>But then I started thinking &#8212; <strong>&#8220;Xtina! <em>You&#8217;re</em> PREGNANT! Have some decency!&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Is she worried about ruining underwear come water-breaking time? (When is that now, could be soon.) Insane labor speed goals??!</p>
<p><strong>Gosh, if you <em>must</em> go pantiless for <em>some</em> reason, <em>avoid motor vehicles entirely!</em> Have you no brain??!</strong></p>
<p>One final note, kudos on the wax job, I believe a woman must look her best come leg-spreading time. Yes, I <em>especially </em>mean labor.</p>
<p>Cick for more photos, #3 NSFW. <a href="http://www.style-spotlight.net/xtina-preg-upskirt/#more-1610" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.style-spotlight.net/xtina-preg-upskirt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
