Top Searches
» Kim Kardashian
» Nicole Richie
» Brangelina
» Jennifer Aniston
Top Frights
» Hoho Coco
» Tara's Reborn Free
» Bunny Trail
» Moore Flashing
Best Dressed
» Angie in Color!
» Mischa Fash Forward
» Vogue Winona
» Wide on Thin
Top Stars
» Jennifer Lopez
» Kim Kardashian
» Nicole Richie
» Britney Spears
Top Commenters
» Jenners (110)
» LadyT. (84)
» ginafly (64)
» Astarlette (56)
» Bad Hair Czar (41)
Top Images
Britney vs. Fat Future of JLo’s Bust Top Pic 2

Katie Holmes Huge in Australia

February 22nd, 2006 at 9:31 am by Sarah Jean Snarker » Bookmark on del.icio.us » Digg It?

Katie Holmes

(Katie Holmes heads to a memorial service for billionaire Kerry Packer, in Sydney, Australia, last Thursday.)

Wow. How many 5 year old children is Katie carrying?

 


Categories Celebrities, Celebrity Fashion, Celebrity Gossip, Tom & Kate Cruise

Related Entries:
-- Katie Holmes and the Peekaboo Bra
-- About to Burst: Katie Holmes and Baby Cruise
-- Tom Cruise Squints Eyes
-- Tom & Katie: Dress (Alike) to Impress
-- Katie Holmes / D & G Leotard
Latest News:
-- ‘Love’ Handling Gossip Attacks
-- ‘Christian’ Kids’ Poll Finds Spears, Paris = ‘Naughty’
-- And SJP’s Upskirt was ‘Nice’
-- Rihanna About in Melrose with Be & D Bag
-- What, is there a Minimum Age Req. for Sexiest Man Alive?


3 Comments on “Katie Holmes Huge in Australia”

  1. Bad Hair Czar Says:

    Who doesn’t wear sleeves to a funeral?

    That is really offensive to me that she would wear a strapless dress to a solemn occasion.

  2. Sarah Joelle Snarker Says:

    Yes, I suppose a bare chest isn’t exactly appropriate. Nothing showy. Then again, it’s been a very hot summer, there!

  3. Bad Hair Czar Says:

    Just looking at the details on the hem and the bust makes me even more disgusted.

    She is dressing up like she is going to a party or a premeire.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>