Top Searches
» Kim Kardashian
» Nicole Richie
» Brangelina
» Jennifer Aniston
Top Frights
» Hoho Coco
» Tara's Reborn Free
» Bunny Trail
» Moore Flashing
Best Dressed
» Angie in Color!
» Mischa Fash Forward
» Vogue Winona
» Wide on Thin
Top Stars
» Jennifer Lopez
» Kim Kardashian
» Nicole Richie
» Britney Spears
Top Commenters
» Jenners (110)
» LadyT. (84)
» ginafly (64)
» Astarlette (56)
» Bad Hair Czar (41)
Top Images
Britney vs. Fat Future of JLo’s Bust Top Pic 2

Law According to Snark: Paparazzi Assault

June 4th, 2007 at 8:38 pm by Sarah Jean Snarker » Bookmark on del.icio.us » Digg It?

New Rule: Assaulting photogs is not a punishable offense.

I’m not saying paparazzi aren’t human, I’m just saying their line of work means they’re the ones who A) don’t belong where they shoot and B) act in a manner that should be considered criminal.

Hugh Grant throws baked beans

Paparazzi stalking stars should be seen as trespassing, and celebs should be allowed to take action to protect their images.

No one actually gets upset at these stars acting out against photographers, do they? We should applaud these stars, as we wish we could act out against those unsolicited phone callers!

Bah!

Powered by Qumana

 


Categories Celebrities, Celebrity Gossip

Related Entries:
-- Jude Law’s ‘Must Have’ Accessories
-- Lindsay’s Crash of Doom
-- Jude Law is Trying to be a Good Dad
-- Celeb spotting: Sienna Miller & Jude Law in Soho
-- Note to Future Stars: If you Don’t Hooch it, Paparazzi won’t come
Latest News:
-- ‘Love’ Handling Gossip Attacks
-- ‘Christian’ Kids’ Poll Finds Spears, Paris = ‘Naughty’
-- And SJP’s Upskirt was ‘Nice’
-- Rihanna About in Melrose with Be & D Bag
-- What, is there a Minimum Age Req. for Sexiest Man Alive?


Comment on “Law According to Snark: Paparazzi Assault”

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>